The challenge
LineaScore needed two different things that are usually forced into one build. A marketing site has to be fast, editable and search-friendly. A reporting application has to hold configurable inputs, generate documents, and change frequently as the product evolves.
The hard part was the output. The product's value is the document a user walks away with, so it needed real dynamic PDF generation — inputs turned into a clean, branded, downloadable report in real time — not a screenshot or a print stylesheet.
Split the architecture, deliberately
We put the marketing landing page on WordPress and the application on Bubble.io at the app subdomain. Each platform does what it is genuinely best at, and neither compromises for the other.
The marketing team can publish without touching the product, and the product can ship changes without a marketing release.
Configurable report creation
The application is built around dynamic report creation: users configure inputs and the platform assembles the report from them, rather than choosing from a set of fixed templates.
That required a data model where report structure is data, not hard-coded layout — which is what lets new report configurations be added without a rebuild.
A custom dynamic PDF engine
We built the dynamic PDF generation feature ourselves. It takes the configured inputs and produces a branded, correctly laid-out document on demand.
Document generation is the piece most no-code stacks handle badly, and getting it right is why the whole product hangs together.
The outcome
LineaScore runs as a clean two-part product: a WordPress landing page that markets it and a Bubble.io application that delivers it, with real-time branded PDF output at the end of the workflow.
It is our reference build for hybrid architecture and for document-generation features, and one of the reasons we can advise honestly on when to split a stack rather than force one platform to do everything.