Our ServicesPlatform & Support

AI and LLM integration for websites, apps and internal workflows

We have shipped AI-powered products, not just AI features: an adaptive interview coach, a multi-model image generation suite for tattoo artists, and a research platform with graph-based data display. That experience is why we start by asking which task the model is actually better at than your current process, and why we design around the fact that models are confidently wrong sometimes.

What You Get

Included as standard on every engagement — not an upsell list.

Use-case assessment before any building

We separate the ideas where a language model genuinely wins — summarising, drafting, classifying, extracting structure from messy text, conversational guidance — from the ones better served by a form, a filter or a rule. You get an honest recommendation, including where the answer is not to build anything.

Retrieval-grounded assistants

Assistants answer from your documents, product data, policies and knowledge base rather than from general training data, using retrieval over your own content. That is what makes the difference between a support assistant that quotes your actual returns policy and one that invents a plausible one.

Content and workflow tooling

Internal tools that draft product descriptions in your tone of voice, summarise long enquiry threads, triage and route incoming leads, translate and adapt copy across languages, or extract structured fields from uploaded documents into your database.

Multi-model architecture

We are not locked to one vendor. Model choice is made per task on capability, latency and cost, with the provider abstracted behind our own interface so switching does not mean rewriting the product. InkGenX runs multiple image models behind a single workflow for exactly this reason.

Prompt design, evaluation and guardrails

Versioned prompts with structured output schemas, a test set of real inputs to compare changes against, refusal and fallback handling, output validation before anything is saved or shown, and a human review step wherever a wrong answer would carry real consequences.

Cost, latency and rate control

Token budgeting, caching of repeated queries, streaming responses so the interface feels immediate, request throttling per user, and usage dashboards. AI features fail commercially far more often than technically, and the cause is almost always an unmodelled per-request cost.

Privacy and data-handling decisions made explicitly

We agree what may be sent to a model provider, what must be redacted, retention and training-opt-out settings, and where processing happens, then document it — so your privacy policy reflects reality and your customers get a straight answer when they ask.

How We Deliver It

Stage by stage, with the approval points marked. AI & LLM Integration follows the same rhythm on every project.

  1. Frame the task and the baseline

    We define the job to be done, what a good output looks like, and what the current process costs in time or accuracy. Without a baseline there is no way to tell whether the AI feature is an improvement or just novel.

  2. Prototype against real data

    We build a narrow prototype using your genuine content and awkward real-world inputs, not curated examples, and put it in front of the people who will use it. Most concepts change materially at this stage, which is exactly what the stage is for.

  3. Engineer the pipeline

    Retrieval and chunking strategy, prompt templates, structured output parsing, validation, fallbacks and logging are built as a proper pipeline rather than a single call, so behaviour is inspectable and each part can be improved independently.

  4. Evaluate and tune

    A fixed evaluation set of real inputs is scored before and after every prompt, model or retrieval change, so improvements are demonstrated rather than felt. We tune retrieval quality first, since most bad answers come from bad context rather than a weak model.

  5. Ship, monitor and iterate

    Launch includes usage and cost monitoring, feedback capture on individual responses, and a review cycle where real conversations drive the next round of prompt and retrieval improvements.

What You Receive

The concrete artefacts handed over at the end — files, access and documentation you keep.

  • Use-case assessment with a build, buy or do-not-build recommendation
  • Working prototype tested against your real content
  • Production AI feature integrated into your site, app or admin panel
  • Retrieval pipeline over your documents and structured data
  • Versioned prompt library with structured output schemas
  • Evaluation set and scoring results for prompt and model changes
  • Cost, token usage and latency monitoring
  • Guardrails, fallback behaviour and human-review workflow
  • Data-handling note covering what is sent, stored and retained

Ideal for

If two or three of these sound like your situation, this is the right place to start.

  • Your team answers the same customer questions dozens of times a week
  • You are drowning in unstructured text — enquiries, documents, transcripts
  • You want an AI feature inside a product, not a bolted-on chat widget
  • A first AI experiment produced confident nonsense and lost internal trust
  • You need content adapted across several languages at volume
  • You are building an AI product and need a team that has shipped one before

Tools we use

Standard, portable tooling. The licences, accounts and source stay in your name, so nothing here is a reason you cannot leave.

  • Bubble.io
  • Next.js
  • React
  • Node.js
  • WordPress
  • PHP
  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • Vector search
  • Webhooks
  • JSON Schema
  • Stripe

Live projects where this work did the heavy lifting:

What we have written about this, in more depth than a service page allows:

Frequently Asked Questions

The questions we get asked most about AI & LLM Integration.

Three ways, used together. Retrieval grounds every answer in your own documents and data so the model summarises rather than recalls. Structured outputs and validation reject responses that do not match the expected shape before anything is displayed or saved. And scoping keeps the assistant inside its remit, with an explicit "I do not have that information, here is how to reach a person" path instead of a guess.
It depends on request volume, how much context each request carries, and which model handles it — which is precisely why we model it before building. We estimate cost per interaction during the prototype, then reduce it with caching, tighter context, and routing simple requests to smaller models. We also set hard usage limits so an unusual traffic spike cannot produce a surprise invoice.
Yes. Typical patterns are a retrieval-backed assistant over your existing content, AI-assisted drafting inside the admin for editors, automated tagging and internal-link suggestions, and enquiry triage that summarises and routes form submissions. Calls are made server-side so no API key is exposed, and the feature is built to degrade gracefully to your normal contact route if the provider is unavailable.
We choose per task rather than defaulting to one vendor, and we build behind an abstraction so the provider can change without a rewrite. Reasoning and long-context work, fast cheap classification, and image generation are genuinely different problems with different best answers. InkGenX runs several image models behind one workflow, and Mocki uses conversational models tuned for adaptive, human-like interview dialogue.
Not if it is configured correctly. Major providers offer API terms and settings that exclude your data from training, and we enable those explicitly rather than assuming the default. We also agree upfront what is sent at all — personal data can be redacted or replaced with references before a request leaves your systems — and we document the flow so your privacy policy is accurate.

Ready to start on AI & LLM Integration?

Send us the brief — or just the problem. You will get a written scope, a timeline and a fixed price, usually within one working day.